Can battle be abolished?

Can battle be abolished?

Can battle be abolished?


1.Introduction.According to the Clausewitz War is only continuation of the plan. So the problem arises can the insurance plan be abolished? Or is usually war inevitable? and we might find no simple answer to these questions. Battle is defined as a violent action where one side my spouse and i.e. Talk about ‘A’ endeavours to impose its can on the other side i.e. Express ‘B’ through the application of force. Today non state actors and terrorists happen to be also found inviting the wrath of a state or certain states coalition. There is absolutely no single agreed after definition of war and no two wars are ever before quite comparable in opposing forces, targets and gains. Before we dwell any further so that they can answer the aforesaid query it is deemed pertinent to analyse the idea of war and its root causes. Only in that case we shall manage to seek the true answer to our question if the war can be abolished and if so under what circumstances and circumstances.

2.Theories of War.War is a intricate societal phenomena instead of unchangeable human nature. Background of war is really as old as the recorded history of mankind upon this planet, but according to battle analysts this does not make it law of characteristics. According to Clausewitz idea of Trinity, military component of nation is a non-rational actor and subjected to political leadership in whose domain lies the rational decision producing process. After the launch of Nuclear Weapons in WW II idea of warfare has been significantly altered. The enormous destructive power of this kind of weapon, which can get rid of the human race from this world, has set such a solid deterrence that many wars have already been averted specifically among the nuclear weapon states. In Bernard Brodie’s thoughts “to any extent further the chief purpose of army isn’t to fight wars but to avert them”. There are typically two wide theories categorised by the analysts to describe the phenomenon of war.

a.Normative Theory.It seeks to determine what the things ought to be. The ethics and morals and what’s right and what is wrong. Is battle justified and if so under what circumstances wars can be fought.

b.Empirical Theory.This theory handles the historical evidence of the evolution of warfare. Circumstances resulting in the on group of war, various tactics employed during the conduct of battle and the reason why for the victory or defeat.

3.Reasons for War. There are number of different known reasons for which wars are fought amongst the states. Kenneth N Waltz describes that in the domain of overseas relations the identification of degree of analysis i.e. “individual, state or foreign system” is significant. Apropos in this discourse condition level will be focused as the primary level of analysis to recognize the reason why of war. Some of them are briefly explained in succeeding paragraphs.

a.Territorial/Border Disputes. Most wars are fought between the two states due to territorial or border disputes. Soon after the rapid decolonization procedure which started in first 1 / 2 of 20th century, the countries were discovered contended with or settling down their geographical borders with their neighbours. Empirical evidence shows where this component is available missing the states have a tendency to go to war to stay their disputes, that they cannot resolve through different means particularly the negotiations.

b.Hegemonic Ambition.The great powers in pursuit of dominance on surface and at seas waged wars through out 19th and 20th century. However, in current occasions this factor is diminishing because of economic concerns and effects of global trade and commerce.

c.Internal Balance. Some times the wars happen to be fought due to inner political disturbance where elite or ruling party so as to preserve its power or maintain over the condition initiates violent use of force. This type of war is often characterised by onslaught of emotional warfare directed at enemy and home front side. This type is quite common in the present day times.

d.Leadership Aspects.The democratic kind asa format sample of governing circumstances is gathering popularity and autocracy is offering. The wars fought in the past were particularly seen as a the wishes and lust of ability by the kings and princes. Various wars were fought because of personal orientation of the tyrannical leadership. Even so, democracies have already been found of staying away from wars generally due to monetary concerns and very well being of their people.

e.Weak State vs Strong State.Since the distribution of natural resources amongst various nation-states isn’t equal hence some instances wars are fought by strong states against weaker states to gain usage of their assets. Another dimension is normally a fragile state waging battle against a parity or good express in the realm to stay the old scores. Many of these wars have been characterized by the precondition of ‘opportunity rather than necessity’ arising out of an internal disturbance/weak scenario in other country.

4.How War Could be Abolished.Throughout centuries mankind provides passed through a process of evolution so is the record of warfare. Through the span of history technology in addition has played its component in the evolution of warfare. After years of quest man could invent a weapon regarded as enough to destroy all of the inventions; Nuclear weapons contain since that time altered the technique of war specifically among nuclear claims or their respective alliances. Deterrence principle had never been thus well established as particularly through the cold war period, which averted effectively any battle between USSR and USA and/or different NATO countries in European countries. This idea of deterrence in addition has worked very well in establishing strategic balance in South Asia and offers averted important wars between India vs Pakistan or India vs China; whose source of animosity particularly is based on border disputes and image resolution of Kashmir issue. Aside from nuclear deterrence there may be other multifaceted aspects that may help to abolish war. Some of these aspects are briefly reviewed in succeeding paragraphs.

a.Political System.People are generally peace loving and require welfare and liberty to go about their daily life according to their wishes and socio-religious procedures. A democratic sort of government, which is usually by the people, of the people, and for the persons greatly manifests the real aspirations of the masses. Apropos in previous century the phenomena of decolonization and rise of democratic kind of governments gained recognition. Empirical data exists that democracies don’t like to fight wars and have a tendency to settle inter status disputes through talks. The political and diplomatic contain thus proved successful in averting the impending wars.

b.Economic Interdependence.A major effect that globalization provides ensued is financial interdependence. Natural and various other resources are not similarly spread thought the universe. The general global peace after Environment Battle II has seen heightened economic interdependence between the states. Consequently mutual dependency is also being seen as a reason behind avoiding war amongst states. European countries has seen battle for more than 100 years but EU is a success story. The EU users states must fulfill two preconditions to be eligible, someone to have democratic sort of authorities and second to have no border disputes with their neighbouring states.

c.Economic Strength.Countries with strong economic power can exert their influence on other economically poor states to accomplish their will, without going to war with that talk about. Countries like USA, China, Japan, Germany and Switzerland training their influence in respective areas of interest due their solid economies.

d.Strong Defence.Strong defence of a nation is manifested though it’s military ability. It ensures its sovereignty and will keep impending threats away and enemies under check.

e.Strong Alliance.Alliance of a group of states particularly with a brilliant power has turned into a source of strength. It has minimized the chances of wars of opportunity against weaker states which may have joined good alliances e.g. NATO.

f.Role of MNC’s.Due to financial implications the Multinational Companies (MNC’s) which are distributed throughout the world regardless of political boundaries exert their effect on states as war is detrimental to their business interests.

5.Conclusion. Abolishing the war math autobiography is both attractive and possible despite human being limitations. The cumulative aftereffect of political, military and economical strength in conjunction with higher literacy fee, acquisition of advanced technology and occupations for the youth can become strength of national electric power. Socio cultural affinity and spiritual independence of the masses surviving in an allegiance within the political boundaries and respecting the same for all those living over the borders makes a state stable and less susceptible to war. Apropos it might be concluded that principles of interpersonal justice and mutual coexistence will be the hallmarks for attaining global peace.


  1. Kenneth waltz
  2. The Causes of War

Sdílet článek